Second grade feminist.

The other day I mentioned that I’ve been reading Ramona and her Mother. Last night I was close to finishing, and in the final chapter Mrs. Quimby mentions to her daughter that Mr. Quimby is going to be starting school at Portland State. The school that rejected me! For some reason this made me feel a little bit of something, I’m not sure what.

Continuing the tradition of being a 2nd grade girl, I have these bottles of American Girl shampoo and conditioner (a gift!) and besides smelling incredible, they also offer young girls bits of advice on the back label, advice regarding “real beauty.” Most likely these are meant to be inspirational, if not empowering, but it occurred to me during a recent shower just how far off the mark they actually are. For example, on the back of the shampoo bottle reads, “Real beauty is thinking before you speak.” What? Shouldn’t that say, “Real beauty is speaking your mind”? Or “Real beauty is speaking the truth”? Or something that doesn’t sound like a 17th century chauvinist wrote it? Sure, there is something to be said about prudent speech, but there is also something very unnatural about prudent, well-spoken girls. Girls are supposed to express themselves! Or maybe that’s what the American Girl people where trying to say with “Real beauty is wearing your favorite color.” Girls, look nice and don’t talk. That’s the real message of American Girl. Ramona would not approve.

3 Responses

  1. hmmmm… is expressing oneself blurting out whatever comes to mind…, or is expression which is satisfactory for oneself prudent and controlled as to actually express effectively what one really wants? Are we all emotion as to let emotion speak for ourselves? Or is it thought that can discriminate what’s simple chemical reaction to what is truth within us and beyond, or at least really attempt to?

    Who expressed him or herself better and his or her ideas better, Emerson in his thorougly thought out essays or Rosie O’Donnel in her violent claims of sincerity for screaming out her mind as is. Who is really more at ease or rigthly proud with what he or she has left behind as words, and whose words are weightier or more tanscendental for those who endured listening to them in some way or another?

    Just a few snobby questions.. I had to speak my mind!

  2. mmm… i don’t think you can really put emerson and rosie in the same category of comparison as 8 year old girls… just my snobby rebuttal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Subscribe, y'alls!
    Breena Wiederhoeft
  • Categories

  • Blog Stats

    • 35,997 hits
  • %d bloggers like this: